2013-01-29 19:26:36 -05:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
layout: default
|
|
|
|
title: Isn't This A Really Complicated Program?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-03 16:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
There is no point in pretending that Ardour is a simple, easy to use
|
|
|
|
program. The development group has worked hard to try to make simple
|
|
|
|
things reasonably easy, common tasks quick, and hard and/or uncommon
|
|
|
|
things possible. There is no doubt that we have more to do in this
|
|
|
|
area, as well as polishing the user interface to improve its
|
|
|
|
intuitiveness and work flow characteristics.
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
At the same time, multi-track, multi-channel, non-linear,
|
|
|
|
non-destructive audio editing is a far from simple process. Doing it
|
|
|
|
right requires not only a good ear, but a solid appreciation of
|
|
|
|
basic audio concepts and a robust mental model/metaphor of what you
|
|
|
|
are doing. Ardour is not a simple "audio recorder" - you can
|
|
|
|
certainly use it to record stereo (or even mono) material in a
|
|
|
|
single track, but the program has been designed around much richer
|
|
|
|
capabilities than this.
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
2014-02-03 21:39:11 -05:00
|
|
|
Some people complain that Ardour is not "intuitive" to use — its
|
2014-02-03 16:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
lead developer has
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://ardour.org/node/3322">some thoughts on that</a>.
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
2013-01-29 19:26:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|