36 lines
1.8 KiB
HTML
36 lines
1.8 KiB
HTML
|
|
<p>
|
|
In the days of analog tape recording, the routing of monitor signals was
|
|
performed with relays and other analog audio switching devices. Digital
|
|
recorders have the same feature, but may impart some
|
|
<a
|
|
href="/synchronization/latency-and-latency-compensation/"><dfn>latency</dfn></a>
|
|
(delay) between the time you make a noise and the time that you hear it
|
|
come back from the recorder.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
The latency of <em>any</em> conversion from analog to digital and back to
|
|
analog is about 1.5–2 ms. Some musicians claim that even the
|
|
basic <abbr title="Analog to Digital to Analog">A/D/A</abbr> conversion
|
|
time is objectionable. However even acoustic instruments such as the piano
|
|
can have approximately 3 ms of latency, due to the time the sound
|
|
takes to travel from the instrument to the musician's ears. Latency below
|
|
5 ms should be suitable for a professional recording setup. Because
|
|
2 ms are already used in the A/D/A process, you must use extremely low
|
|
<dfn>buffer sizes</dfn> in your workstation <abbr title="Input/Output">I/O</abbr>
|
|
setup to keep the overall latency below 5ms. Not all
|
|
<a href="@@the-right-computer-system-for-digital-audio">computer audio systems</a>
|
|
are able to work reliably at such low buffer sizes.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
For this reason it is sometimes best to route the monitor signal
|
|
through an external mixing console while recording, an approach taken by
|
|
most if not all professional recording studios. Many computer I/O devices
|
|
have a hardware mixer built in which can route the monitor signal "around"
|
|
the computer, avoiding the systemlatency.<br>
|
|
In either case, the monitoring hardware may be digital or analog. And in
|
|
the digital case you will still have the A-D-A conversion latency of
|
|
1–2 ms.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|