43 lines
2.0 KiB
HTML
43 lines
2.0 KiB
HTML
|
|
<img class="right" style="clear:both" src="/images/track-layer-dialog.png"
|
|
alt="Track layering menu" />
|
|
<p>
|
|
Ardour allows arbitrary <dfn>layering</dfn> of regions — you can
|
|
have as many regions you wish at a given position. By default, the regions are
|
|
<dfn>overlaid</dfn> in the editor window, to save vertical space.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
However, this display mode can be confusing for tracks with many overdubs,
|
|
because its not obvious in which order the overdubs are layered. Although
|
|
there are other methods of moving particular regions to the top of an
|
|
overlapping set, and although Ardour also has playlists to let you manage
|
|
<a href="/working-with-playlists/playlist_usecases/">takes</a> a bit more
|
|
efficiently than just continually layering,
|
|
there are times when being able to clearly see all regions in a track without
|
|
any overlaps is reassuring and useful.
|
|
</p>
|
|
<p>
|
|
Here is an image of a track with a rather drastic overdub situation,
|
|
viewed in normal <dfn>overlaid mode</dfn>:
|
|
</p>
|
|
<img src="/images/a3_overlaps_layered.png" alt="overlapping regions in overlaid mode" />
|
|
<p>
|
|
To change this display, right click on the track header, and you'll see
|
|
the menu displayed above. There are two choices for layers. <kbd
|
|
class="menu">overlaid</kbd> is currently selected. Click on <kbd
|
|
class="menu">stacked</kbd> and the track display changes to this:
|
|
</p>
|
|
<img src="/images/a3_layers_stacked.png" alt="overlapping regions in stacked mode" />
|
|
<p>
|
|
You can still move regions around as usual, and in fact you can
|
|
even drag them so that they overlay each again, but when you
|
|
release the mouse button, things will flip back to them all being
|
|
stacked cleanly. The number of <dfn>lanes</dfn> for the track is determined by
|
|
the maximum number of regions existing in any one spot throughout
|
|
the track, so if you have really stacked up 10 overdubs in one spot,
|
|
you'll end up with 10 lanes. Obviously, using a large track height
|
|
works much better for this than a small one.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|