f76fc34c29
Updated libsigc++ from 2.0.6 to 2.0.17. git-svn-id: svn://localhost/ardour2/branches/2.1-staging@1413 d708f5d6-7413-0410-9779-e7cbd77b26cf
123 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
123 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
dnl
|
|
dnl SIGC_CXX_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION_OPERATOR_OVERLOAD()
|
|
dnl
|
|
dnl
|
|
AC_DEFUN([SIGC_CXX_GCC_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION_OPERATOR_OVERLOAD],[
|
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([if C++ compiler supports the use of a particular specialization when calling operator() template methods.])
|
|
AC_TRY_COMPILE(
|
|
[
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
class Thing
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Thing()
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
void operator()(T a, T b)
|
|
{
|
|
T c = a + b;
|
|
std::cout << c << std::endl;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<class T2>
|
|
class OtherThing
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
void do_something()
|
|
{
|
|
Thing thing_;
|
|
thing_.template operator()<T2>(1, 2);
|
|
//This fails with or without the template keyword, on SUN Forte C++ 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5:
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
OtherThing<int> thing;
|
|
thing.do_something();
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_gcc_template_specialization_operator_overload=yes
|
|
AC_DEFINE([SIGC_GCC_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION_OPERATOR_OVERLOAD],[1],[does the C++ compiler support the use of a particular specialization when calling operator() template methods.])
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_gcc_template_specialization_operator_overload])
|
|
],[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_gcc_template_specialization_operator_overload=no
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_gcc_template_specialization_operator_overload])
|
|
])
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
AC_DEFUN([SIGC_CXX_MSVC_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION_OPERATOR_OVERLOAD],[
|
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([if C++ compiler supports the use of a particular specialization when calling operator() template methods omitting the template keyword.])
|
|
AC_TRY_COMPILE(
|
|
[
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
class Thing
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
Thing()
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
void operator()(T a, T b)
|
|
{
|
|
T c = a + b;
|
|
std::cout << c << std::endl;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<class T2>
|
|
class OtherThing
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
void do_something()
|
|
{
|
|
Thing thing_;
|
|
thing_.operator()<T2>(1, 2);
|
|
//This fails with or without the template keyword, on SUN Forte C++ 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5:
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
OtherThing<int> thing;
|
|
thing.do_something();
|
|
],
|
|
[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_msvc_template_specialization_operator_overload=yes
|
|
AC_DEFINE([SIGC_MSVC_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION_OPERATOR_OVERLOAD],[1],[does the C++ compiler support the use of a particular specialization when calling operator() template methods omitting the template keyword.])
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_msvc_template_specialization_operator_overload])
|
|
],[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_msvc_template_specialization_operator_overload=no
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_msvc_template_specialization_operator_overload])
|
|
])
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC_DEFUN([SIGC_CXX_SELF_REFERENCE_IN_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION], [
|
|
AC_MSG_CHECKING([if C++ compiler allows usage of member function in initialization of static member field.])
|
|
AC_TRY_COMPILE(
|
|
[
|
|
struct test
|
|
{
|
|
static char test_function();
|
|
|
|
// Doesn't work with e.g. GCC 3.2. However, if test_function()
|
|
// is wrapped in a nested structure, it works just fine.
|
|
static const bool test_value
|
|
= (sizeof(test_function()) == sizeof(char));
|
|
};
|
|
],
|
|
[],
|
|
[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_self_reference_in_member_initialization=yes
|
|
AC_DEFINE([SIGC_SELF_REFERENCE_IN_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION],[1],
|
|
[does c++ compiler allows usage of member function in initialization of static member field.])
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_self_reference_in_member_initialization])
|
|
],[
|
|
sigcm_cxx_self_reference_in_member_initialization=no
|
|
AC_MSG_RESULT([$sigcm_cxx_self_reference_in_member_initialization])
|
|
])
|
|
])
|