Among other things, this means that automation controls/lists have the actual
min/max/normal/toggled of parameters, and not those inferred from the Parameter
ID, which is not correct for things like plugin parameters.
Pushing things down to the Evoral::ParmeterDescriptor may be useful in the
future to have lists do smarter things based on parameter range, but currently
I have just pushed down the above-mentioned currently used attributes.
Remove old (already #if 0'ed) implementation of Evoral::coverage() and its
comments.
Tidy up the comment enumerating all the possible ways in which two ranges
can overlap, note the Evoral::OverlapType corresponding to each one, and add
comments to the if()s in coverage corresponding to the cases in the list of
overlap types.
Remove some commented-out assert()s that actually do happen, and re-instate
one that really shouldn't.
Fix a small typo (with -> within)
The various conditionals in Evoral::RangeList::subtract() appear to have
been there to work around
(a) coverage() not always returning the correct value, &
(b) the test suite assuming that the ->to point lies outside the range
Now that these are both fixed, the implementation of subtract() becomes
quite a bit clearer. I replaced the if()s with assert()s for now, but these
shouldn't trip if coverage() is working as I expect.
Also (attempt to) clarify the comments in subtract.
Comments in various call sites of Evoral::coverage() marking things I think
are dubious (with XXX). Also straightened up the alignment of some ASCII
art in libs/ardour/diskstream.cc
Rewrite Evoral::coverage() to (hopefully) do what it's supposed to.
Return OverlapNone for invalid ranges: if either of the ranges passed to
Evoral::coverage() have negative length (i.e. start > end), return OverlapNone
- it seems reasonable to say that a negative-length range can't overlap
anything. Also return OverlapNone from the fallthrough case, though this should
never happen.
Some of the tests for Evoral::RangeList::subtract() assume that ranges
don't contain their end (->to) point. This appears inconsistent with how
they are used elsewhere.
Add some ASCII art comments to the tests to try to clarify what they're
really testing for, and amend subtractTest1, subtractTest4, & subtractTest5
to incorporate the assumption that ranges include their end points.
This is not used anywhere in Evoral and is just a wrapper around the PBD
RingBuffer anyway. Towards a (once again?) independently buildable/testable
Evoral and fewer cross-dependencies.
for one, it can mess up the value when switching to
numeric-entry. It is also rather useless and not
Fader-like (faders are not scrollbars).
Besides, "stepvalue" is way to large and causes jumps
(sometimes step-value is even negative, see
"fast lookahead limiter", "release time"
-> some other bug)
fixes crashes:
* If the Editor-Mixer shows a channel with a plugin that
has been edited in the Mixer, double-clicking the plugin
will try to bring up a 2nd instance of the plugin-UI.
* When closing Ardour both the Mixer and the Editor-Mixer try to delete the underlying plugin, resulting in a double free.
This probably isn't correct in several ways, but it works more than it did, so
I figure it's push worthy.
Still not working:
* Saving mute automation list
* Dragged control points are not snapped to model restrictions
(boolean, in this case, but general problem)
* Line goes funny if you record mute automation
(as opposed to drawing it which works)
This was necessary due to a bug/design issue between Glibmm and Glib (see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561885)
but the problem needs to be managed by the *creator* of the IOSource and that has now moved inside CrossThreadChannel.
Add a test function to test Evoral::coverage() with all possible overlap
types. The first test (line 161) that expects OverlapExternal will fail
with the current implementation of coverage().
There's possibly still a discussion to be had about what the overlap type of
ranges with negative lengths should be: there are currently places in the main
Ardour code base where coverage() is called with ranges where start > end.
Fix compile errors in libs/evoral/test/, by explicitly calling
Evoral::MusicalTime::to_double() wherever a double value is required of a
MusicalTime.
Some of the double variables should probably really be made into MusicalTime
ones instead, but I don't want to mess with this too much.
takeFiveTest still fails for me after this, but a failing test is probably
more informative in the long run than a test that won't even compile.
Reverse the parameters of Mackie::Control::stop_touch() to make them
consistent with AutomationControl::stop_touch(), and fix up the call to
AutomationControl::stop_touch() to have the parameters in the correct
order.
Unfortunately, I don't possess any devices that speak the Mackie protocol, so
though the patch seems logical and correct to me, I have no way of testing it.
If anyone has a device with touch faders that speaks Mackie, I'd be glad of any
confirmation that it at least doesn't break anything.
* ifdef unused static functions
* brackets around assignment and comparision
* no return statement in function returning non-void
* boost concept_checks.hpp unused-local-typedefs
This lets us get a more explicit handle on time conversions, and is the main
step towards using actual beat:tick time and getting away from floating point
precision problems.
Fix initial read of discrete MIDI controllers.
Fix spurious note offs when starting to play in the middle of a note.
Faster search for initial event when cached iterator is invalid.
So much for dropping the cached iterator. The iterator is responsible for
handling note offs, so that doesn't work. This design means we have some stuck
note issues at the source read level, but they should be taken care of by the
state tracker anyway.
I am not precisely sure why the cached iterator was causing this problem, it
shouldn't be invalidated, and the times make sense. It may be some lock
related issue since the iterator holds a lock on the source.
In any case, this cached iterator was just to avoid repeated linear search of
the model, but since the model has a logarithmic search, instead just scrap all
this problematic persistent state and search for the appropriate start time
every read. No need to be careful about invalidating when anything changes.
This should probably hijack the same modifier as the guard points and work the
same on all automation tracks, but I did it this way to not change behaviour of
track automation where a default is much more reasonable.
No functional changes in this one (for easier auditing), but towards having
round up/down only if necessary modes, rather than kludging around that
situation with a double round as we do currently.
Another consequence of fuzzy Sequence timing, but if the difference is less
than a tick this should handle things correctly. If the difference is more
than a tick, something's wrong, and it might be okay to just bump forward
anyway, but I can't reproduce this and it could lead to corruption so I'm
leaving that case noisy.
This cleans up a lot of false-positives in static analysis
and also helps compilers to optimize code paths in general.
(tagging the fatal stingstream operator as ‘noreturn’ is
far less trivial)
