ardour/livetrax
13
0
Fork 0
Code

don't display hidden automation-controls.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin Gareus 2015-10-28 18:58:46 +01:00
parent 661ffe7576
commit dbf28e320c
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
gtk2_ardour/route_time_axis.cc
View File

@ -2333,14 +2333,9 @@ RouteTimeAxisView::add_processor_to_subplugin_menu (boost::weak_ptr<Processor> p
}
if (x == processor_automation.end()) {
rai = new ProcessorAutomationInfo (processor);
processor_automation.push_back (rai);
} else {
rai = *x;
}
/* any older menu was deleted at the top of processors_changed()
@ -2363,6 +2358,10 @@ RouteTimeAxisView::add_processor_to_subplugin_menu (boost::weak_ptr<Processor> p
string name = processor->describe_parameter (*i);
if (name.begin == X_("hidden")) {
continue;
}
items.push_back (CheckMenuElem (name));
mitem = dynamic_cast<Gtk::CheckMenuItem*> (&items.back());
@ -2389,6 +2388,13 @@ RouteTimeAxisView::add_processor_to_subplugin_menu (boost::weak_ptr<Processor> p
mitem->signal_toggled().connect (sigc::bind (sigc::mem_fun(*this, &RouteTimeAxisView::processor_menu_item_toggled), rai, pan));
}
if (items.size() > 0) {
processor_automation.push_back (rai);
} else {
delete rai;
return;
}
/* add the menu for this processor, because the subplugin
menu is always cleared at the top of processors_changed().
this is the result of some poor design in gtkmm and/or